Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review
نویسندگان
چکیده
Accounting, life cycle assessment (LCA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) are examples of various research areas that independently develop apply diverse methodologies to evaluate performance. Though, many methods have in common the results be assessed mainly determined by inputs outputs activities which evaluated. Based on both production decision theory, our comprehensive framework integrates systematically distinguishes specific types production-based performance assessment. It allows examine categorise existing literature such approaches. Our review focuses sources explicitly concepts or multiple criteria (MCDA). We did not find any elaborated methodology fully MCDA with theory. At least, a basic approach multicriteria analysis, generalises appears well-grounded was already presented this journal 2001 has rarely been noticed until now. A short overview outlines its recent insights main findings. key finding is category mistake prevails among well-known efficiency measurement like DEA. may imply invalid empirical because processes confused resulting impacts destroying creating values (to minimised maximised, respectively). conclude defining open problems indicating prospective directions.
منابع مشابه
Performance indicators for supply chain resilience: review and conceptual framework
In the current competitive and dynamic market, customer demands and interests are changing continuously, and hence, risk of disruption in the supply chain is also increasing. To be successful in this scenario, supply chain of a firm should be resilient. Most of the firms realize that with a specific end goal to develop a resilient supply chain, there is a need for assessment of performance. The...
متن کاملA Framework for Sensitivity Analysis in Spatial Multiple Criteria Evaluation
The paper presents a framework for sensitivity analysis (SA) in spatial multiple criteria evaluation (S-MCE). The framework focuses on three aspects of S-MCE: spatiality, scope, and cardinality. Spatiality stresses the importance of spatial criteria and spatial weights that should be explicitly considered in GIS-based MCE. Scope relates to the extent of SA, ranging from local one-at-a-time crit...
متن کاملQuality function deployment: Integrating comprehensive matrix and SWOT analysis for effective decision making
In this ever-changing business scenario, the manufacturing product industries have to be in position to rec-ognize the ever changing pulse and demands of the market. Customer satisfaction and quality management has become a strategic issue for companies in the new millennium. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) lit-erature suggests that building up the House of Quality (HoQ) is not a difficult ta...
متن کاملdesigning and validating a textbook evaluation questionnaire for reading comprehension ii and exploring its relationship with achievement
در هر برنامه آموزشی، مهم ترین فاکتور موثر بر موفقیت دانش آموزان کتاب درسی است (مک دونو و شاو 2003). در حقیقت ، کتاب قلب آموزش زبان انگلیسی است( شلدن 1988). به دلیل اهمیت والای کتاب به عنوان عنصر ضروری کلاس های آموزش زبان ، کتب باید به دقت ارزیابی و انتخاب شده تا از هرگونه تاثیر منفی بر دانش آموزان جلوگیری شود( لیتز). این تحقیق با طراحی پرسش نامه ارزیابی کتاب که فرصت ارزیابی معتبر را به اساتید د...
15 صفحه اولA framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making
a r t i c l e i n f o The classic multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) model assumes that, when taking a decision, the decision maker has defined a fixed set of criteria and is presented with a clear picture of all available alternatives. The task then reduces to computing the score of each alternative, thus producing a ranking, and choosing the one that maximizes this value. However, most ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Operational Research
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1872-6860', '0377-2217']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.046